Search for: "FELTS v. STATE" Results 3221 - 3240 of 5,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 3:58 am by Amanda Sanders
The recent case of Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras v Deutsche Bank SAE considered what records an employer was obliged to keep to comply with the Working Time Directive. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:37 am by Erin Miller
Concurring Opinions also posts on a new essay from the Virginia Law Review about Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:41 am by Erika Pickles
” Although the court held the employer’s disclosure met the “conspicuous” requirement, it held the disclosure was not “clear” — it pointed to a specific sentence that it felt a reasonable person wouldn’t understand and noted that combining federal and state disclosures in the same document would confuse an applicant. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:18 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Frantic, Inc. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London case number B326222, in the Court of Appeal in the State of California, Second Appellate District (18 March 2024)] [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:39 am by Tom Crane
 This is a decision rendered by the state court of appeals in El Paso. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 7:41 am by Sarah M Donnelly
If the lawsuits were refiled in Utah, or one of many other states with a shorter statute of limitations, they would likely be dismissed. [read post]
15 May 2008, 2:24 pm
So, I felt admirably open-minded. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:21 am
“As one might expect, after reading the transcript, it is simply not possible to determine who is to ‘blame’ for the questioning to deteriorate to such a state that one of the parties felt it necessary to leave,” wrote Smart. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm by Aaron Weems
  To illustrate this point, the Court in Centre County recently issued a holding in the case of Allen v. [read post]