Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 15,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2020, 3:09 pm
In late March, the Supreme Court will hear argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Torres v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 10:58 am
Aug. 19, 2013) and NML v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Just trying to figure out if it’s a penalty default or reflects preferences. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
New on the podcast: Black Lives Matter, a qualified immunity cert petition (Kelsay v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
Perez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
Topics will include, amongst others: the implications of non-obviousness for follow-on medical innovation (e.g. drug repurposing) after the UK Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Actavis v ICOS; the current and future roles of competition law in controlling drug prices, including an update on Flynn and Pfizer; and the potential effect of Brexit on the trade of medical products. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 4:13 pm
Reporting restrictions In The Queen v HNC [2019] NICA 33 reporting restriction orders had been made under section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, Article 3 ECHR and section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
They met in a public place, Rossknecht somehow figured out the plan, and s [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
" Rosado v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 1:10 am
The UK patent attorney exam P6/FD4 (Infringement and validity) has a notoriously low pass rate. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:59 am
In Dariel M. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 8:17 am
–Johnson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Maghu v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am
The General Court denies likelihood of confusion, contrary to EUIPO In one of its last decisions in the old year (judgment of 19 December 2019, T-40/19, Amigüitos pets & live v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
In Qualcomm v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
Is the desire to be even stricter simply another sign of the pathological way we treat our presidents as father figures and our strange incorporation of Josh Chafetz's insight that since impeachment=tyrannicide, and therefore paracide, it should become almost literally unthinkable? [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the operation of the section 4 defence in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
