Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 16,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 10:21 am
That offense resulted in a fine of $130 and a restitution order of $750, but it also means that his guideline range goes up four to six months.In the end, I think that the Ninth Circuit gets it right, and finds that this offense should probably not be included. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:16 am
But while Justice Ikola reverses the confirmation, in the end, I think it'll be fine. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:29 am
That seems fine to me, and I was surprised that the district court denied the request. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:37 pm
(I was fine, by the way, with both the initial slam as well as its subsequent deletion. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:23 am
It doesn't matter if you're fine with an 11-1 verdict; presumably, because you believe that the 11 are on your side and the 1 against. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
That'd be just fine too. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:33 pm
The officer told the driver this was fine and backed up to allow the car to pull away. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:57 am
In both R v Soneju [2005] UKHL 49 and R v Knights [2005] UKHL 50, the House of Lords was concerned with a breach of the then applicable six-month time limit for making a confiscation order. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
The court distinguishes Lemmon v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:32 am
Accordingly, in Jane v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:59 am
Finally, if the controlled substance is a Schedule V controlled substance, the penalty is typically a fine and/or community service. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm
Frye v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:59 pm
By Eric Goldman Tatro v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:59 am
(And we don't yet know if there will be an appeal, so this may not be the final word from the Oregon Courts.)Oregon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
He recognised that the second stage requires the judge to make a very difficult and sometimes a finely balanced judgment.In favour of admitting the evidence, the argument will always be that justice requires the evidence to be admitted in addition to wider considerations such as public interest in exposing official misfeasance and protecting the integrity of the criminal trial process; vindication of reputation; the public righting of public wrongs, and will always depend primarily on the… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
Chavez v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:24 pm
The FCC said it would not fine C-SPAN for broadcasting the tapes.Source: ABA Journal [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
Mazer v Stein, 347 US 201, 214 (1954) concerns the protection of lamps. [read post]
