Search for: "Gay v. State" Results 3221 - 3240 of 3,776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:00 pm by BKK
It also includes discrimination based on sex stereotyping, actual or perceived sexual orientation or transgender status, and other circumstances where the plaintiff “was perceived as not conforming to traditional male stereotypes” the court stated, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in 2020 in Bostock v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
States also have a corresponding obligation to regulate the protection of human rights in sport, and to provide access to efficient and effective legal remedies for cases of discrimination or other human rights abuses by sporting bodies or private actors.4. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
I stated that Sir Nicolas “pledged that his court would declare same-sex marriage to be a European-wide human right” if, by that date, “several countries” had managed to put gay marriage into law. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:46 am
Supreme Court is asked by a state and the federal government to reconsider a case it has just handed down because it missed key evidence.But that is what is happening now in Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Register, Thomas Claburn looks at Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 2:37 pm by David Schraub
To be sure, intermediate scrutiny -- even in its muscular United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:06 pm
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 5:52 pm
In the abortion-protest context, the Supreme Court in Hill v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:14 pm
See: N.Y. eyes gay marriage but opponents vow fightA Washington D.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:39 am by Mays & Kerr LLC
In her appeal, Evans argued that the trial court improperly failed to consider existing 11th Circuit decisions, such as 2011’s Glenn v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am by Lovechilde
And there were plenty of states where you couldn’t hold public office if you didn’t swear to believe in God (as opposed to Allah, Buddha or a flying plate of spaghetti) until the Torcaso v. [read post]