Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm
” Even if they were mistaken, Scalia continued, “that doesn’t show a bad motive on their part, does it? [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
In its recent case, FDA v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:20 am
Judge Agee dissented (Deltek, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 2:22 pm
Heuer, MARRAMA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court settled, once and for all, that gender identity and sexual orientation are protected “sex-based” characteristics under federal law in the landmark case Bostock v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 2:35 pm
It does not contain a point of principle or new understanding of the law that family judges are not already applying in similar circumstances. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
., Dole v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
"He does have an immigration application pending," she said. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:16 am
If the state sues in civil court, though, the legal actions are titled things like "State of Texas v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
Harris. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:59 am
That Judge Duncan wrote the majority opinion might be explained by his assuming an “expertise” in such issues, much as Justice Harry Blackmun was tasked with writing Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
The Press has published the collected works of Langston Hughes, Harry Truman and Mark Twain, for example. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm
So what does all this add up to? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:03 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
Let’s talk about the decision in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:23 pm
As we learned from the Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:59 am
Cafferty v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:41 am
The modern left-wing brights – Dennet, Dawkins and Harris – commit similar but distinct logical errors in their quest to use logic and statistics to support ethereal principles, and in the process violate the is-ought distinction and building castles of air on a foundation of sand. [read post]
