Search for: "His Law v. USA"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 3,297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2007, 11:28 am
Home Depot USA, Inc., Gershman-Brown & Associates, Inc., and G.B. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0256p.06 2007/07/10 USA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
"Taylor portrays the Court's gag on law clerks -- which has slipped now and then, most recently in notable fashion when David Margolick, Eugenia Peretz and Michael Shnayerson reported on Bush v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
The secrecy under which the provision is administered guarantees a lack of oversight and negates the possibility of effective change to the law. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
The secrecy under which the provision is administered guarantees a lack of oversight and negates the possibility of effective change to the law. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 2:24 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0250p.06 2007/07/02 USA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:43 am
Nestle USA, Inc., No. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Benson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 5:47 am
Covering the UK plus 5 key international jurisdictions: Australia; Canada; France; Germany; and USA, this new edition has been brought right up-to-date and includes updated coverage of trade marks law (including Arsenal v Reed), revised content to take account of the Act 1998, and changes to copyright law, in the US in particular".What the IPKat says: Having recently undergone a bout of academic reading, it was a pleasure to read a law book that is… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Defamation Bill 2006 should have provided an opportunity to consider this issue - but that Bill would not have changed the law in this area had it been enacted.On the libel tourism point, possibly the best Irish example is USA Rugby Football Union Limited v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Defamation Bill 2006 should have provided an opportunity to consider this issue - but that Bill would not have changed the law in this area had it been enacted.On the libel tourism point, possibly the best Irish example is USA Rugby Football Union Limited v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
For the reasons stated below, we reverse. 07a0245p.06 2007/06/26 USA v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:03 am
In Washington, lying no longer registers as an offense against the rule of law. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0215p.06 2007/06/11 USA v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:30 pm
(I must have missed that day in law school.) [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:32 am
Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling in Watson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
USA, et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
For the reasons discussed below, we AFFIRM in part and REVERSE in part. 07a0199p.06 2007/05/31 USA v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
