Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 10:00 am
Story C. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
Law Offices of Irene C. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:19 am
§ 615 (f)(3)(C). [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:30 am
A material change of circumstance may include, but is not limited to, failures to adhere to the parenting plan or an order of custody and visitation or circumstances that make the parenting plan no longer in the best interest of the child. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:48 pm
As Massachusetts dog bite injury attorneys we thought you may be interested in the following facts. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:12 am
(c) If a deceased person would be entitled to compensation under Subsection (a)(2) if living, including a person who received a posthumous pardon, the person's heirs, legal representatives, and estate are entitled to lump-sum compensation under Section 103.052. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:26 pm
The controller shall carry out the erasure without delay, except to the extent that the retention of the personal data is necessary: (a) for exercising the right of freedom of expression in accordance with Article 80; (b) for reasons of public interest in the area of public health in accordance with Article 81; (c) for historical, statistical and scientific research purposes in accordance with Article 83; (d) for compliance with a legal obligation to retain the… [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Interested in getting your record expunged? [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:04 am
Both the Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines (I-A(9), I-A(10), I-A(14) and Massachusetts General Laws (M.G.L. c. 208, § 34) specifically authorize the treatment of military pensions and retirement pay as income when calculating a support award. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:04 am
Both the Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines (I-A(9), I-A(10), I-A(14) and Massachusetts General Laws (M.G.L. c. 208, § 34) specifically authorize the treatment of military pensions and retirement pay as income when calculating a support award. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Phone hacking: Simon Mckay, solicitor advocate, has an interesting post with an alternative angle on the Culture, Media and Sport select committee report, questioning MPs’ condemnation of Rupert Murdoch. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:16 am
It also ordered Frank to "pay $300 per week in temporary child support”. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:30 am
If the relocating parent spends more time with the children than the other parent, the relocating parent is presumed to be entitled to relocate unless the other parent can establish one of the three grounds listed under Tennessee Code Annotated ยง 36-6-108(d)(1), to wit: (A) The relocation does not have a reasonable purpose; (B) The relocation would pose a threat of specific and serious harm to the child that outweighs the threat of harm to the child of a change of custody; or… [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:30 am
If the relocating parent spends more time with the children than the other parent, the relocating parent is presumed to be entitled to relocate unless the other parent can establish one of the three grounds listed under Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-6-108(d)(1), to wit: (A) The relocation does not have a reasonable purpose; (B) The relocation would pose a threat of specific and serious harm to the child that outweighs the threat of harm to the child of a change of custody; or… [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:00 am
C section 3011(d). [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:54 pm
Slay noted an interesting distinction that has arisen between the old and new jurisdictional provisions. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:04 pm
She has a particular interest in international child maintenance and has been actively involved in policy discussions on this issue. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:02 am
This analysis evaluates the current regime and the proposed reform from an angle of non-Member States, focusing on three issues of particular relevance to the interests or positions of such States. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:51 pm
Call Center c. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:20 am
Paradigm Shift: IP Backlash—Now It’s Political I reproduce the panel description because it is in itself a document of interest (and because, though I missed it, I heard that the conference keynote speaker devoted some time to praising ACTA)—compare the panel description to what the panelists actually said: Paradigm shift: now it's political. [read post]
