Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 3221 - 3240 of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 12:05 pm by Michael Fox
Everyone has and continues to wait with concern the Court's decision in Dukes v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
  In the Stanford Lawyer, Jane Schachter concludes that the case “will present an occasion for the Court—and especially Justice Kennedy—to reflect on” its 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:16 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
And this year, the Supreme Court also rejected FDA v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
“You’re out of court” if Roper does not apply, Justice Scalia said. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:01 pm by Graham Smith
 Notes:1.The question of whether merely browsing a copyright work online requires the permission of the copyright owner is currently the subject of a reference to the EU Court of Justice in Newspaper Licensing Agency v PRCA. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
(The majority consisted of three conservatives—Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion, and Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh—plus the three liberals, Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson.) [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:05 am by Steven M. Gursten
He is available for comment on Michigan’s new auto accident law, McCormick v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:47 am by Kalvis Golde
So last year, when the justices scheduled arguments for Tuesday, October 8, in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The case of Banks v Cadwalladr concluded before Steyn J in the Royal Courts of Justice this week, with Cadwalladr arguing that her belief that the “covert relationship” between Banks and the Russian government was reasonable; the defence of public interest applies. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm by Gene Quinn
In a unanimous decision delivered by Chief Justice John Roberts (left) in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:37 am by SHG
Copyright © 2007-2018 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Orin S. Kerr
  But from the standpoint of precedent, it seems to me, they're just the views of three Justices that didn't command a majority of the Court. [read post]