Search for: "In re J. C." Results 3221 - 3240 of 4,388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 9:55 am by Terry Hart
— Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed— (A) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain; (B) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180–day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or (C) by the distribution of a work being… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by Gareth Carline
  The Court held that the termination also terminated the consent and the continued use of the portrait required re-obtaining the manager’s consent. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by Gareth Carline
  The Court held that the termination also terminated the consent and the continued use of the portrait required re-obtaining the manager’s consent. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps P22 – Font used in Harry Potter merchandise could spell damage award (IP Osgoode)   US Trademarks Another big IP auction scheduled for September, but this time it’s not patents (IAM) New Mexico chile legislation shows power of certification mark (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (IPKat)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 18: TTAB denies motion to re-open testimony period,… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps P22 – Font used in Harry Potter merchandise could spell damage award (IP Osgoode)   US Trademarks Another big IP auction scheduled for September, but this time it’s not patents (IAM) New Mexico chile legislation shows power of certification mark (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (IPKat)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 18: TTAB denies motion to re-open testimony period,… [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by Sylvain Métille
La question de la reconnaissance faciale sur le réseau social Facebook a déjà fait couler beaucoup d’encre des deux côtés de l’océan atlantique, mais elle revient ces jours sur le devant de la scène pour des raisons différentes. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:08 pm
Até o momento, oito ministros já se manifestaram sobre a questão trazida no RE, no qual o governo do Rio Grande do Sul contesta decisão do Tribunal de Justiça do estado que declarou inconstitucional a progressividade da alíquota do ITCD (de 1% a 8%) prevista no artigo 18 da Lei gaúcha 8.821/89 e determinou a aplicação da alíquota de 1%. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Divergência No início do julgamento divergiram da relatora os ministros Marco Aurélio, Dias Toffoli, Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha e Gilmar Mendes. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:35 am by Michael Feit
C'est oublier qu'un tel grief est expressément exclu dans le domaine considéré par une disposition spécifique, à savoir l'art. 77 al. 2 LTF, comme on l'a déjà indiqué. [read post]