Search for: "LEE v. STATE"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
In 2002, Atkins v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
State, 286 S.W.3d 321, 329 (Tex. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
Scarcely less sad is the scrap over the annotated statute laws of the State of Georgia, recorded by Andy Johnstone on the same weblog. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
(See Navarro Savings Ass’n v Lee, 446 U.S. 458, 461 [1980] [“a federal court must disregard nominal or formal parties and rest jurisdiction only upon the citizenship of real parties to the controversy”]). [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Constitutionality of Florida Hospital Lien Depends on Mechanism of Creation
3 Jan 2019, 12:47 pm
Recently, in Lee Memorial Health System v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am
” The Washington Post’s editorial board weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
United States, 385 U.S. 206, 210; United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am
The court denied cert in only two relisted cases, Lee v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
Lenawee County, Michigan, had an apocalyptic Christian nationalist militia problem about a decade ago. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 8:12 am
Lee, 579 U. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Lee, Elizabeth Holland, and Patrice P. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Jane announced that the Fourth Circuit affirmed the 2012 refusal to vacate the sentence in the United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
See, e.g., Imbler v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:27 am
State of Nevada v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Rossignol v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
CLOSEST RACE IS JUDGE PANDO V. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:24 pm
In Stratcap Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
The trial court recognized that the multi-step procedures articulated by the Tennessee Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Lee at Ars Technica reports that the New Zealand Court of Appeal has ruled against Kim Dotcom, saying that he can be extradited to the United States for his role in operating the site Megaupload. [read post]
