Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 3221 - 3240 of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:43 am
While primarily designed for government lands, its text and application extends to movable property. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:59 pm by Ronald Mann
This afternoon the justices asked for briefing from the parties, the United States as amicus curiae supporting Oklahoma, and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, as amicus curiae supporting Murphy, on two questions that seem to suggest a search for a new way to resolve the controversy. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:25 am by Amy Howe
The justices declined to take up the property-rights question presented by a California case, 616 Croft Avenue v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Whereas his previous work did an admi- rable job of depicting how the historical trans- formation of ownership in the United States was aided by the process of measuring and recording, he has expanded his range here into a somewhat unmanageable though always interesting tract. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by Steve Davies
  It contains what is now considered the third-largest natural gas field in the United States (Pinedale Field). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Overview of Taxes on Tangible Personal Property In the United States, levies on personal property emerged in tandem with taxes on real property. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289052.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court Bond v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
And Section 1806(f) establishes special in camera and ex parte procedures to determine the admissibility of such evidence, if the Attorney General attests that a typical adversarial hearing would harm the national security of the United States. [read post]