Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 3221 - 3240 of 155,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2015, 10:04 am by Fabio Arcila
An exemplary instance recently occurred when the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:13 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a state legislature cannot prohibit the federal courts from using the class action device for state law claims. [read post]
14 Jun 2005, 8:11 am
Granville [PDF opinion] Ohio courts have issued conflicting rulings on the state's custody law. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Briefs: State’s Opening Brief Oregon Amicus Tribal Brief US Brief Indian Law Professors Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations En banc stage briefs: Washington Rehearing/En Banc Petition Idaho and Montana Amicus Brief Klamath Critical Habitat Landowners Amicus Brief US Response Tribal Response District court materials are here: Tribal Motion for Summary Judgment State Motion for Summary Judgment District Court Opinion   [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Court described its holding as follows: These consolidated appeals involve the sometimes delicate and precarious dance between state law and federal law. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
  We rely on state law to decide whether to take someone's default (since Rule 4(e)(1) borrows state law). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Indian law section: Q & A with Washington State Bar section chair Bree Black Horse. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 11:22 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Fletcher (Michigan State University - College of Law) has posted Muskrat Textualism on SSRN. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 1:09 pm by NARF
McClellan (Judicial Powers; Adoption of Foreign Law) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html In re T.R. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Jonathan Hafetz (Seton Hall Law School) has posted The Suspension Clause after Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
They claimed that after Roe v Wade was overturned in June 2022, the groups stopped aiding Texan women to leave the state to get abortions—because of the fear of prosecution under the states abortion ban. [read post]