Search for: "Long v. State" Results 3221 - 3240 of 45,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2017, 3:03 pm by Whitney Roy
NINTH CIRCUIT FINDS “THREATENED” DESIGNATION FOR BEARDED SEALS PROPER BASED ON NEW LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS Alaska Oil and Gas Ass’n et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 am by Chip Merlin
This has long been the law in Michigan, as noted in the fire damage case of Casey v Auto-Owners Insurance Company.1 The Casey court stated:      We conclude that amendment was futile because the Caseys merely sought to add a variety of theories that had no factual or legal basis, and that had essentially already been dismissed by the trial court. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
L. art. 5 (2006), available at http://www.bepress.com/jtl/vol1/iss1/art5/ (link).It's nice to see him make it again, particularly with Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:25 pm
Most unanimous decisions have a voting line that looks something like the one in Long Island Care at Home v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm by INFORRM
alp judgment continues a strong tradition in European Court jurisprudence where freedom of expression prevails in cases of insult or defamation of heads of state, presidents or high ranking politicians (for example, Lingens v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:48 am
HTTP.jpg Internet chat logs were authenticated by a witness who testified that they represented a full and fair reproduction of the year-long online "relationship"; Fifth Circuit notes developing circuit consensus on authenticating Internet chat logs, in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
” The court properly rejects the long-discredited argument that Section 230 only applies to “defamation-like” claims, citing Doe II v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:43 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
The appeals court agreed with Father, stating that the trial court erred in their sua sponte order for civil contempt. [read post]