Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 3221 - 3240 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance and Information Gathering MPs discussed and voted on the Investigatory Powers Bill last week in the report stage of the Bill’s progression through Parliament, the third vote before the Bill was sent to the House of Lords. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
 Lord Justice Floyd in Lilly has adopted a purposive approach in relation to indirect infringement. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am by Máiréad Enright
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Raphael Murillo
In response to the dramatic expansion of the Spanish Crown during Emperor Charles V’s reign, elites in the court and the Emperor himself typically employed inspections as a means of collecting records and reports. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am by John Culhane
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:34 am by Susan Brenner
In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was `the best that the nature of the case will allow’. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am by Rosalind English
The Human Rights Convention, in requiring that states ensure respect for family life,  protects first and foremost the rights of the child. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am by Cyberleagle
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Charles O'Mahony
Janet Lord and Rosemary Kayess led the afternoon session on day 3. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The House of Lords Select Committee on Communications have published a report entitled “Growing up with the internet” [pdf] recommending an ambitious programme of digital literacy, minimum standards for those providing internet services and commitment to child-centred design. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am by INFORRM
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Jenny Gesley
The final version of the ECCTA, which incorporated Lords amendments, received royal assent on October 26, 2023, but it has yet to come into force. [read post]