Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 3221 - 3240 of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
  We don’t think that should matter, but to the extent that it does – a word to the wise is sufficient. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:36 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Even if the patentee did not intend to dedicate this subject matter to the public, “[t]he patentee, rather than the public, must bear the burden of inadvertent errors in the patent – including inadvertent dedications. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It didn’t matter that the “gratuity” was mandatory. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Really interesting argument in the paper: trade dress is good candidate for rules even though it’s not (always) a rights-based limitation b/c other identification means are always available w/r/t any given design. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 7:11 am by Jessica Kroeze
Der Einspruch stützte sich auf die in Artikel 100 a) und b) EPÜ 1973 genannten Einspruchsgründe der unzu­rei­chenden Offen­barung, der fehlenden Neuheit, Artikel 54 EPÜ 1973 und der mangelnden erfinderischen Tätigkeit, Artikel 56 EPÜ 1973.III. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:10 am by Steve Baird
The matter shown in broken lines is not part of the mark. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 2:44 pm by Steven E. Kaplow
” MOU Section VII (B) goes on to make any conspiracy or attempt to commit one of the designated offenses also a reportable offense. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cody, 2017 CSC 31 [1] Dans l’arrêt R. c. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:50 am by Daniel Richardson
Dep’t of PATH, 2011 VT 93 (mem.).Remember our coverage of the gripping story of the “snow-shoveling incident” that came out last Fall? [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
NJ Management Gp.: used image of 9/11 fireman juxtaposed against Iwo Jima photo; Fox was trying to say that they didn’t need to license that b/c they were commemorating the event. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
It doesn’t matter if the maker of the drug was negligent, or if they intentionally or recklessly sold a dangerous product. [read post]