Search for: "Mark A. Roberts" Results 3221 - 3240 of 10,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 5:24 pm by Molly Runkle
Other early coverage of the argument comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Pete Williams of NBC News, Mark Walsh at Education Week, Lydia Wheeler of The Hill, Ariane de Vogue of CNN, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, David G. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:55 am by Lovechilde
  As you can see, this is quite an impressive list: Fuzzyone, Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, Lonnie Lazar, Locke Bowman, Robert Reich, Norman Solomon, Robert Borosage Richard (RJ) Eskow, Dave Johnson, Mark Hertsgaard, Peter Miller, David Onek, Eva Paterson, Keith Kamisugi, Reggie Shuford, Timothy Silard, Arcelia Hurtado, Allen Hopper, Steve Bright, Ty Alper, Natasha Minsker, James Clark, Judy Kerr, Stephen Rohde, Richard Dieter, Virginia Sloan, Sasqi (aka Farnaz Fatemi),… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 2:56 pm by Peter Howard Tilem
This marks the second time Judge Neary has been reversed by the Appellate Division in decisions published in the New York Law Journal in the last six months. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:09 am by Molly Runkle
Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog, while other early coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Pete Williams of NBC News, Mark Walsh at Education Week, Ariane de Vogue of CNN, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, David G. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
The Washington Post's Robert Barnes has this news analysis on the decision and what it portends for the Roberts Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
So far, we've published articles by (among others) Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Christopher Yoo (Penn), and more. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:39 am
The AP's Mark Sherman reports here on yesterday's ruling in United Hauler's. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:45 pm by Danny Jacobs
The first footnote explains the quote came from Anna Scott, played by Roberts in 1999′s “Notting Hill. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:57 pm
  Speakers include:David Chen, Founder -- Equilibrium Capital Group;Patti Glaza, Executive Director/CEO -- Clean Technology and Sustainable Industries Organization;Robert Hurt, Professor Division of Engineering -- Brown University;James Hutchison, Professor and Director of SNNI, Department of Chemistry -- University of Oregon;Rajesh Naik, Technology Advisor Materials and manufacturing Directorate -- Air Force Research Laboratory;Robert Tanguay, Associate Professor,… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 7:37 am by StephanieWestAllen
[Mark] Siegler said, “you have to care about a patient. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Forensic Perspectives is updated by Mark Gottlieb, Mayda Kramer and David Pomerantz of MSG Accountants, Consultants & Business Valuators. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:55 am
Updating this Jan. 8, 2008 ILB entry, today the AP's Mark Sherman reports "Supreme Court upholds use of lethal injections. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm by Rick Hasen
And if that word is a death knell to Obamacare, it would likely mark the end of any remaining illusions of a “hypothetical Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 11:46 am by Maggie McLeod
Roddy is representing Robert Sirianni, managing partner of the Brownstone Law Firm. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:04 am
At the Supreme Court, Duke University professor Erwin Chemerinsky observed that in the final years of the William Rehnquist Court, the justices showed a marked tendency to overturn death sentences. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:11 pm
Roberts (with Alito) and Scalia (with Thomas) are not at cross purposes. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:09 am
Holcomb quoted Chief Justice John Roberts, who said capital punishment was constitutional. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:03 pm by Michel-Adrien
Yet under Chief Justice Roberts’ guidance, the Court has looked past labels and legacy to interpret laws as constitutionally as it can. [read post]