Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 7,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2016, 1:14 pm
If the sponsors have changed their tune, and rather suddenly, then that appears to be a concession that our criticism has been on the mark. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
""The Federal Circuit's interpretation of Section 289, however, does exactly what Congress is not allowed to do. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:01 am
(Library of Congress) Discipline was stern, but not nearly as harsh as that of the Red Army in WWII. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:47 pm
If ERISA plans want broader remedies, they will have to take their complaints to Congress. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 10:43 am
I love my daughter. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:19 am
The following is a guest post by Peter Roudik, director of legal research at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
I. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:03 pm
Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and others in the Congress. 9:28 p.m. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:47 am
June 13 will mark the 50th anniversary of Miranda v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:52 pm
“I want to tell her that I met the band. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
(The constitution also sets limits on Congress’s authority and expressly grants other authorities to the states - I’m not going to go into these, because it would require explaining a semester’s worth of constitutional law doctrine). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:35 pm
This is an issue for Congress and the president. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
I got your number. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am
Calvin TerBeek I would like to thank Professor Balkin for the opportunity to join this fascinating discussion. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:38 pm
Article 46, § 1, of the Amendments [to the Massachusetts Constitution] provides, “No law shall be passed prohibiting the free exercise of religion,” and parallels the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, “Congress shall make no law … prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]…. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 5:17 am
Congress. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm
I suggest the extent of the difficulty of criticism from the United States by a reminder of the scope and objectives of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:41 pm
Addressing the proposed drawdown of U.S. forces, Campbell said “my intent would be to keep as much as I could for as long as I could. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 6:40 pm
To build on Mark's post, I want to point out that there are significant obstacles for lawyers who are inclined to interpret Reconstruction broadly (or just correctly), let alone for those who aren't.First, there are no detailed notes on the discussions of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction, which was created 150 years ago this month. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:37 pm
By contrast, in the Act Congress addressed LPTV/translators only to say that their rights were not altered. [read post]
