Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 6,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 2:28 pm
Carter--booking a room solely for the purpose of... [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:20 am
Virginia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:19 am
Alcohol, which most people consume solely for recreational purposes, may be consumed during one’s time off from work with no concern over termination, so long as that person is sober when they report to their scheduled shift. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Above all, these acts are crimes against the People of the State of New York and Society must be considered as well as the 'family tranquility.' Finally, this Court must take note of the recent decision in the case of People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
We have also asked them to link to the original judgments here so people can form their own informed view as to whether Mr Booker is right or not. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 11:00 pm
From cookie-based tracking to people’s interaction through social media, the size and the degree of granularity of our digital footprints have created unprecedented opportunities for business development and service delivery. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 10:17 pm
World Outreach Conference Center v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:29 pm
Though most people are relatively familiar with the “best interests” term, it regularly defies a firm definition. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Even when they do not make the rules, they apply them, and they will be rarely overruled by their Chairmen solely on the complaint of a private party. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
Some examples include (i) guiding people who are visually impaired, (ii) pulling a wheelchair, (iii) alerting and protecting a person who is having a seizure, (iv) retrieving dropped items, (v) alerting hearing-impaired people to the presence of people, sounds, and hazards, and (vi) reminding a person with mental illness to take prescribed medications. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:40 am
” See DRL § 70; DRL § 240; see Eschbach v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
” After Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Francis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
B.A.S. v S.R.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
In the case Batson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
(NB, this is not a record of moving into work, nor does it include people returning to JSA after a short period. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:58 pm
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
