Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 3221 - 3240 of 5,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Sun editor Victoria Newton said the paper “welcome(d) the closure of this investigation,” calling it “an outrageous abuse of state power which risked having a chilling impact on whistleblowers and a free press,” the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:50 am by Mark Walsh
” Roberts announces that Justice Kennedy has the Court’s opinion this morning in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm by Kristin E. Hickman
Justice Thomas concurred but expressed “willingness to consider whether delegation jurisprudence has strayed too far from our Founders’ understanding of separation of powers. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:20 am by Bradley Joondeph
On Monday, a sharply divided Supreme Court held in Comptroller v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:24 am by Eugene Volokh
In Boston, Mayor Thomas Menino reportedly took a similar view [UPDATE: but has since recanted]: Mayor Thomas M. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In particular it will supersede the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) and parts of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Thomas filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Justice Alito joined (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
The Court’s Rejection of the Physical Presence Rule in Quill Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court; writing for a majority that included Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, and Gorsuch.[8]  Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
CTB v NGN [2011] EWHC 1232, in which Eady J prevented publication of the name of Ryan Giggs as the premiership footballer who had been in a relationship with Imogen Thomas. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am by INFORRM
There should be some form of back stop power, vested in another body and, given that body needs sufficient powers to demand compliance, it will, regrettably have to be one regulated by the state. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
And yes, I know your three word response will be "Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am by Florian Mueller
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]