Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
In this year's Matal v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm
Dupuy v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:40 am
Perez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:43 am
Feb. 17, 2010). http://kuex.us/867a Ojeda-Sanchez v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:35 am
One v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am
In Palomo Sànchez v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:47 am
Queens Long Island Med. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The People) (Ars… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
GenOway v S.A. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm
Crucial in the Queen’s Bench decision was that the judge improperly applied even the old test of standard of review, focusing exclusively on the outcome in a Dunsmuir analysis, rather than the entire process. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The Queen, [1971] S.C.R. 738, at p. 740). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
In agreement with the Master of the Rolls and the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, in my judgment, this appeal should be dismissed. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:40 pm
A Media Communications and List has of course been in existence since 2017, although as Chief Master Marsh pointed out in Mezvinsky & Anor v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWHC 1261 (Ch), it is not yet a designated specialist list: “[13]…It was not created by a provision in the CPR, or in statute, and without underplaying its significance, it is a means by which work that is already within the Queen’s Bench Division is allocated for its… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
We have offices in Manhattan and Long Island, handling cases in New York City, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and surrounding areas. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:32 pm
Additional Resources: Oddo v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:21 pm
” The postscript to the reported judgment of Seagrove v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:03 pm
The announcement brought the ‘cameras in court’ debate back on the news agenda and it is likely to remain so in May; it is reported that the justice secretary’s plans for cameras in court (restricted to the judge’s summing up and sentencing) will be included in the Queen’s Speech. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:34 am
More secret justice on the horizon Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play [read post]
