Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 7,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
They are very much part of the geographical territory of a sovereign State. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am
There should be some form of back stop power, vested in another body and, given that body needs sufficient powers to demand compliance, it will, regrettably have to be one regulated by the state. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:52 pm
See People v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
Boyle v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:48 am
I’ve been actively writing about Section 230 recently, so I thought it might help to round them up into a single post: * An Overview of the United States’ Section 230 Internet Immunity (2019). [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Sept. 27, 2012); Rounds v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 2:30 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm
The High Court judgment is particularly welcome in terms of how explicitly it states that the ECHR requires reading domestic legislation to recognise non-religious beliefs and in how it debunks many of the objections often given for extending protection in this way. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:02 pm
Wrote Chief Judge Mary Beck Briscoe for the unanimous three-judge panel in Golan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 2:36 am
As reported in various newspapers, several states have moved forward with the next round of climate change litigation. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
I'll go into more detail on that part in the coming days, subject to whatever else will happen, such as a potential new round of Ericsson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:10 am
Take Our Poll# 6 Carcieri challengers The people, groups, tribes, and states and state subdivisions that want to use a poorly-reasoned Supreme Court decision to stop Indian gaming at all costs are legion. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
There is no explicit exemption for political speech in either Title 17 of the United States Code (the statutory source of copyright in the United States) or in the Copyright Act in Canada. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:03 am
United States Department of Transportation et al, 15-cv-04987 (N.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
