Search for: "Rolling v. State" Results 3221 - 3240 of 4,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:04 am by Conor Clarke
It has been clear for decades that the United States can roll over the debt and continue paying interest even as it prioritizes other spending. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:07 am by Evan George
Then a coalition of states and environmental groups challenged the denial, and the result was the landmark decision Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm by Peter Margulies
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The court applied the reasonable consumer standard to the consumer protection laws of fourteen states. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 1:58 pm by Peyton
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which rolled back federal abortion rights and potentially allowed states to punish doctors for providing such care. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Joshua Matz
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 1:02 am by Steve Lubet
Under the cover of night, without a single word, the Supreme Court effectively extinguished Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:45 pm
Breaking my silence however, I've just blogged over at the ORG-blog on Welcome to the Former Big Brother House - considering the new programme of rolling back the surveillance state and bolstering civil liberties in the Lib/Con coalition document; and wondering what more concessions to better privacy we might get in the ongoing process of reforming the Data Protection Directive, where a first draft proposal is expected by end 2010. [read post]