Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS" Results 3221 - 3240 of 5,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
  The IPKat in his favourite holiday retreatKicking right in the week, court report from the UK: Sky v SkyKick - no CJEU reference re removal of own name defence to EUTMs ruled Birss J. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
| "Big Box" not found generic or lacking distinctive character, but still .... | Changes to the Singapore copyright system: an update on the recent public consultations | he diplomatic crisis of Qatar and Gulf Cooperation Council's IP | Bundesgerichtshof's landmark ruling to hook extra-territorial patent infringement in Germany | BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patent | Monday Miscellany | Sunday… [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The Court dismisses Actavis' cross-appeal on the basis that if its products did not directly infringe, they would indirectly infringe to the extent held by the Court of Appeal.And, of course, the weekly updates Monday Miscellany and Sunday Surprises.Photo credit: rawdonfoxPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 154 [week ending Sunday 2 July] I Book Review: Patent Drawing Rules I German Supreme Court holds that extra-territorial delivery can result in patent infringement I Canadian… [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Sellers [ 224 Va. 168 (1984)] concerned facts almost identical to the facts alleged in this case". [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
Following Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30; [2004] 1 AC 260, this was fatal to the granting of third party debt orders. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:48 am by William McGrath
The cases appear to be the first of their kind relating to the purchase of shares in the pre-IPO market.In the federal court case, SEC v. [read post]