Search for: "STATE v BUSH" Results 3221 - 3240 of 4,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2009, 11:44 am
Olson and David Boies, who represented opposing sides in the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
If the Bush Administration was the greatest disaster in modern American history, surely Bush v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:09 am
  That right to sue was lost in May 2003 when President Bush created an exception to cover Iraq. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
"The executive order was illegal and violates the statute," said Lorber.That case is Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:32 am
  I mentioned earlier that an important finding in Entergy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert v… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
Hasen (Loyola Law School - Los Angeles) has posted Bush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:25 pm
  The lead case is Maqaleh v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
  it is simply impossible for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint stating a claim based upon these facts. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:38 am
  On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 8:05 am
Analysis NOTE: Nearly a quarter-century ago, in Navy Department v. [read post]