Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2016, 1:16 pm
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:09 am
United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:57 pm
[Marietta Drapery & Window Coverings Co., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:08 pm
No. 10-2734 JCH, United States District Court, D. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:52 pm
Ct. 1740 (2011), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that “California’s Discover Bank rule is preempted by the [Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:57 am
As noted in Bill's post, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
Copyright protection in the United States was “effectively unavailable for pornography” until the landmark decision by the Fifth Circuit in Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
State of California , 2022 Cal. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am
ARS National Services, Inc., 09-CV—780 JAH in United States District Court of California. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:06 am
Vacating the district court’s dismissal on the pleadings of a roustabout’s California wage and hour claims, the appeals court held that state wage and hour laws are adopted as surrogate federal law as long as they are “applicable and not inconsistent” with existing federal law and California’s minimum wage and overtime laws are not inconsistent with the FLSA (Newton v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm
[That statute disqualifies a person from "holding any office under the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
Supreme Court in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 11:55 am
State of California, No. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
The prosecution's argument countered the defense's argument based on United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
(“UCL”); (12) violation of Article I, Section 2 of the California Constitution; and (13) violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:21 am
Idaho State University et al – United States District Court – Idaho District Court – February 15th, 2019) involves a discrimination claim. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:32 pm
In Ralphs Grocery Company v. [read post]
