Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 3221 - 3240 of 13,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm by John Lewis and Joseph S. Persoff
Recent decisions by both the California and United States Supreme Courts have found that state policies which unduly impede arbitration are invalid. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm by John Lewis and Joseph S. Persoff
Recent decisions by both the California and United States Supreme Courts have found that state policies which unduly impede arbitration are invalid. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:48 am by Eugene Volokh
In 1952, voters amended the California Constitution to deny tax exemptions to people who "advocate[] the overthrow of the Government of the United States or the State by force or violence or other unlawful means or who advocates the support of a foreign government against the United States in the event of hostilities. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
Shah, a citizen of Thailand, Canada, and an overseas citizen of India, went to college in the United States and spent a year after she graduated from college in California. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
(With the exception of a mid-September media law conference in central London featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, all other events we tracked this summer took place in the United States.) [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Crescent Cheng
In a recent opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed in part the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California’s grant of summary judgment to the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) in Friends of the River v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “In a major shift in United States military policy in Syria, the White House said on Sunday that President Trump had given his endorsement for a Turkish military operation that would sweep away American-backed Kurdish forces near the border in Syria. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to bar within a matter of hours--ex parte, i.e., without a hearing--Avanci, Nokia, Sharp, Conversant (which has very recently become the third and latest Avanci member to sue Daimler for patent infringement, as I reported earlier today), and Optis from seeking another AAII against Continental in Germany.Today's TRO motion renews the original pursuit of a U.S. antisuit injunction against… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Regents of the University of California comes from Naaz Modan at Education Dive. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:11 pm by Richard Hunt
As I predicted, the United States Supreme Court denied Domino’s Petition for Certiorari today. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
Picasso case (United States District Court for the Northern District of California). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
Justice John Paul Stevens explained his standpoint clearly in a dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]