Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 3221 - 3240 of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2007, 5:15 am
§ 109(b), including bylaws that would affect the size and composition of the board, see Richman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:17 am by Adam Wagner
A, B and C are all European citizens: A and B are Irish, while C is Lithuanian. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Based on a poorly developed record, the court cannot conclude that the prosecution sustained its burden of establishing probable cause akin to People v Hargroves, People v Sanchez, People v Sellers, People v Yiu C. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
That three-part test, long advocated by influential scholars, provides that employment non-compete arrangements will be sustained if: (a) they are no more restrictive than reasonably necessary to protect an employer's business interest; (b) they do not impose an undue hardship on the employee; and (c) they are not prejudicial to the public interest. [read post]
Conversely,  the United States contends that “and” is used to join (a), (b), and (c) by distributing the phrase “does not have. [read post]