Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
First, the court relies upon El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The district court explained that CAFA defines a “class action” as any civil action filed under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by 1 or more representative persons as a class action. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
On May 16, 2024, the Court issued its first in a series of blockbuster administrative law decisions: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
First, in a 1984 Supreme Court case called Chevron v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:33 am
Blue, New York State Supreme Court Criminal Branch Law Library, First Judicial District, New York, New York [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:32 am
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, a thought leader on FRAND since his landmark Microsoft v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:24 pm
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Golden v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
District Court in Tallahassee. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
District Judge Phillip Gutierrez ruled against SiriusXM in 2014, holding that California state law, as it is written, gives the master recording owner exclusive performance rights.In Florida a court found that there was no state law to protect pre-1972 recorded works. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:40 pm
Since Chandler v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
Section 1400 states that a “civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides”; In Fourco, the last time the Supreme Court examined the statute, it concluded that corporations reside in “the state of incorporation only. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:01 am
Turner v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:37 am
“Beverage Holdings I” (Beverage Holdings, L.L.C. v. 5701 Lombardo, L.L.C., 2017-Ohio-2983- Vacated): The Eighth District Court of Appeals in Beverage Holdings I, initiallyagreed and affirmed the trial court’s decision.In so doing, it reiterated the general law of commercial contract interpretation in Ohio, citing several Ohio Supreme Court and Eighth Appellate District decisions. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:37 am
“Beverage Holdings I” (Beverage Holdings, L.L.C. v. 5701 Lombardo, L.L.C., 2017-Ohio-2983- Vacated): The Eighth District Court of Appeals in Beverage Holdings I, initiallyagreed and affirmed the trial court’s decision.In so doing, it reiterated the general law of commercial contract interpretation in Ohio, citing several Ohio Supreme Court and Eighth Appellate District decisions. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:18 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:36 am
Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
