Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 7,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 6:41 am
Last week, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Ninth Circuit decided Mwangi v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
The Taubman Company v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:02 am
Article 2 Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Customs Protection of IPRs 2003, however, goes beyond this obligation and applies to both import and export.Article 30 Foreign Trade Law 2004 is to give the foreign trade department of the State Council the legitimacy to take measures in case of an IP right holder that hinders the licensee from questioning the validity of the IPR involved in the license agreements, conducting forced package license or providing… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:53 pm
The article discusses a recent California district court decision, Lenz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 7:49 am
Moore v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
Rokita) and Baze v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
Wyeth, 619 F.3d 632 (6th Cir. 2010); Mason v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
In Kimble v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
” Authors’ Guild v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
Proof of actual confusion is not a required element, SAP AG v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Richardson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Richardson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:06 pm
Ironically, that rule comes, in part, from the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in the case of People v Cress (yet another Battle Creek area murder case). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
Morris v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:05 am
§1 (interesting states that "insane" includes "every idiot, insane person, and person non compos mentis")"Designed Quickly" - that is whether the taxpayer quickly designed to place property beyond the reach of the government, Fumo v. [read post]
