Search for: "State v. Law" Results 3221 - 3240 of 157,649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 6:50 am by Matthew Kolken
Supreme Court will hear the following case today: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:57 am
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government R (S) v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
In turn, Max Mosley v News Group Newspapers, is a prime example of a claimant not having advanced knowledge prior to publication and therefore being unable to prevent publication.The basis of Max Mosley v UK is best summarised by Dominic Crossley (Steeles Law LLP) stating:“…although we all have a right to privacy, it is entirely up to the editor of a newspaper whether or not we are able to exercise that right in any effective or meaningful way. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am by MBettman
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm by Jaimie Cremeans
[JURIST] Lawyers for the state of Georgia argued Friday in court filings with the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit [official website] that its immigration law is constitutional under the recent US Supreme Court [official website] ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Indian law section: Q & A with Washington State Bar section chair Bree Black Horse. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:04 am by Fabio Arcila
An exemplary instance recently occurred when the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 1:09 pm by NARF
McClellan (Judicial Powers; Adoption of Foreign Law) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html In re T.R. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:13 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a state legislature cannot prohibit the federal courts from using the class action device for state law claims. [read post]