Search for: "State v. Master"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 3,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
In Perez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:25 am
As for Dill v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm
” Traditional wisdom as to cases that go to trial can be found in Master Hurst’s comments in Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (t/a Washington DC) (No 2) [2003] EWHC 9024 (Costs): “There is an argument for saying that in any case which reached trial a success fee of 100% is easily justified because both sides presumably believed that they had an arguable and winnable case. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
The essence of Aarhus is the requirement that participating states should make available a review procedure for environmental decisions which is ‘fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive’. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:51 am
GermanyProtester v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:16 pm
See Ebenhoe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
The purpose of the new Act, according to the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, seems to be a mixture of saving money and speeding up cases – which itself saves money. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:41 pm
Nothing in the legislation indicates who will pay for the services of a Special Master. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Across the interbellum era, Americans not only debated the Constitution, laid down vital precedents, and helped fashion the framework of constitutional law; they not only claimed that the Constitution carried certain meanings or led to certain results on federal power, state police power, Cherokee autonomy, or the fate of slavery; in a broader sense, they confronted the problem of constitutional inheritance itself. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
.: The Center for a New American Security will hold a discussion on state exploitation of financial networks to support weapons programs titled Financial Networks of Mass Destruction. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
Applying Ortiz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
The basic ideas are easily grasped and the mathematical notation can be mastered in just a few minutes. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
The basic ideas are easily grasped and the mathematical notation can be mastered in just a few minutes. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:16 am
Missouri v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:49 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in ITServe Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
