Search for: "State v. Prime"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 3,296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 12:02 pm
Blanco is thus a prime example of why we describe preemption as the most a powerful defense a drug or device manufacturer has at its disposal.There are two prior California appellate PMA preemption decisions, Steele v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 2:57 pm
Anthony v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Nichols, are co-owners of Prime Mortgage USA, INC. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:11 am
Now Barclays has filed this action in federal court based on losses it suffered from the other failed hedge fund.The action, entitled Barclays, PLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 4:37 am
In so doing, the Court held that its prior decision in Prime Care of Northeast Kansas, LLC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:28 am
On the Horizon: --California: Supreme Court is now considering scope of the "genuine dispute" doctrine as a defense to bad faith claims (Delgado) and the application of concurrent causation to pollution liability claims (State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Scruggs, a prime mover in the $246 billion tobacco settlement with the states, is arguably the most formidable plaintiffs lawyer in history. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:34 pm
Jeffrey Pearson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 4:07 am
That's why Public Citizen was arguing the plaintiff's side of Riegel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
In those two cases, none of the patent-holders contributed anything to the economic development of the highly profitable products that were created by thousands of other people and the amount of money demanded as damages in those two cases bore no reasonable relationship to the inventor's alleged contribution to those products.The Eolas and Blackberry cases are prime evidence of patent law run wild - a development which has not escaped the notice of the US Supreme Court, whose decision… [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:25 am
Today's Hindu carries an op-ed by Vishnu V. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:24 pm
In the landmark Miranda v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:58 am
Computer Acceleration Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:43 am
PSEG Power New York, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
The suit, Byers v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:31 am
And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
