Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 4:07 pm
Nevertheless, a word of caution is in order. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
The Tenth Circuit explained that, based on a 2009 Supreme Court decision (Penn Plaza v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:28 am
On August 17, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:43 pm
And just in time, because the state's legislators were about to receive a sternly worded letter, written by Prof. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:48 pm
In Reutzel v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:08 am
Woodhams v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Oklahoma State Regents). [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:18 am
Who would have thought we would read the words "Donald Trump is right" in a New York Times editorial about anything, but especially about one of the Left's favorite jurists.Mr. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45) he should have omitted the… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:23 pm
Reacting to the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in King v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
A three-judge panel agreed in Mandel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:41 am
Moreover, as will be seen below, the word “authorize” is used in one sense in the United States, in another very different sense in the international treaties and the EU, and in yet a third very different sense in the Commonwealth countries (wherein the term has yielded conflicting results at the highest judicial level).The brief looked at the state of the law in early 2005 on "secondary liability" and "authorization" in the USA, UK, Canada… [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 1:48 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
Jul. 22, 2013) and Prather v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:06 pm
In its recent judgment in Stomakhin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:55 pm
" See Barton v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday's disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us - People v. [read post]
