Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 14,816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
The Public Domain in the United States just got smaller.In this Kat’s opinion, SCOTUS (The Supreme Court of the United States) picked quite an interesting time to release its opinion in Golan v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:50 pm
States have a strong interest in maintaining competition in the healthcare market, and most hospital merger or acquisition transactions are sufficiently large to trigger HSR notification requirements. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Later that same day, as journalists and bystanders watched, the applicant, Kaloyan Handzhiyski, the then chairman of the local chapter of the party Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria (DSB), arrived, and placed a red Santa Claus cap on the head of the already painted statute and, at its feet, leave a red sack bearing a white band marked ‘Resignation’. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Yesterday’s post was at pains to show how the Supreme Court, in Yee v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 9:03 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:03 pm
He stated that a strong position while entering a mediation does not preclude meaningful participation in the process. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:55 pm
Friday, the first day of the FTC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:59 pm
This past week, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
But Rule 83.3(c)(3) makes special provisions for attorneys for the United States (e.g., the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
The report, released today on behalf of Alaskan State Officials, says that the captain of the M/V Matanuska, a 408-foot ship operating as part the Alaskan State Ferry System, slammed into a seafood company’s dock after the captain made a critical error in navigation. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
Yesterday (Monday, March 4, 2019) a Qualcomm v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:37 pm
Between last term's Beard v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:55 pm
The New Mexico Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
” Laster v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
