Search for: "Supreme Court of Florida"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 18,476
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Supreme Court instructed it to reevaluate the House’s subpoena power. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Laura Kalman, Distinguished Professor, University of California – Santa Barbara, Department of History; and Ganesh Sitaraman, Professor of Law and Director, Program in Law and Government, Vanderbilt Law School; deliver the 2020 Poucher Lecture, The Prospect, History, and Controversies of Supreme Court Reform. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 6:14 pm
Central to the Florida Supreme Court decision in R.R. et al., v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
(…) Orthopaedic Center of South Florida, P.A. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
For instance, Florida and Virginia, in addition to Washington, D.C., allow third-party ballot collection only in emergencies or with extenuating circumstances, such as a voter’s disability, illness or accident. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
The Senate Judiciary Committee (Motto: "No Democratic Supreme Court Nominees within 3 1/2 years of an election. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Zota, the Florida Supreme Court defined an insurance broker as an individual who “represents the insured by acting as a middleman between the insured and the insurer, soliciting insurance from the public under no employment from any special company…[and] places it... [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:27 am
” Notably, the scope of what it means to exceed authorized access is before the Supreme Court this term, with argument in that case scheduled for later this month. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
The Arizona Supreme Court found that the presence of such conduct was not sufficient to contest the election. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
As the Supreme Court held in Bush v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 9:22 am
Gorsuch expressed surprise that the Vermont Supreme Court had decided the case without referring to Florida v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
The Eleventh Circuit reasoned that, according to long-standing Supreme Court precedent from the 1800s, Trustees v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
The Eleventh Circuit reasoned that, according to long-standing Supreme Court precedent from the 1800s, Trustees v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
The Eleventh Circuit reasoned that, according to long-standing Supreme Court precedent from the 1800s, Trustees v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:16 am
Montana stands out as a state with strong protections for reproductive freedom, especially in its geographic region, but that’s mostly because of its governor, as well as some important state supreme court precedents. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:55 am
Unfortunately, the less than artfully drafted language of 731.301(2) muddied the waters on what should have been an obvious point, leading some to believe “formal notice” is enough to subject non-residents to a Florida court’s personal jurisdiction (it’s not). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:47 am
" She said the law firm where she was working at the time represented Bush and that she had gone down to Florida "for about a week at the outset of the litigation" when the dispute was in the Florida courts. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
” by Bill Estep (Lexington Herald-Leader) for MSN Maryland: “Maryland Lawmakers Issue Subpoena to Hogan’s Former Chief of Staff Over Six-Figure Payout” by Pamela Wood for Baltimore Sun Lobbying National: “Lobbyists Face Challenges Meeting Newly Elected Lawmakers in November” by Alex Gangitano for The Hill Canada: “Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeal in Aga Khan Lobbying Case” by Jim Bronskill (Canadian Press) for CTV The post… [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd & Ors v Wagner & Ors [2020] QCA 221 the Supreme Court of Queensland dismissed the defendant’s appeal against an award of $3,6 m defamation damages to a wealthy Queensland family defamed in a report about the fatal Grantham floods in 2011. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:06 pm
Senate Republicans Are Playing a Dangerous Game with the Court’s Legitimacy By Jane Chong, Lawyer, Williams & Connolly Jane Chong writes that Senate Republicans are twisting the idea of precedent to defend their attempt to place a new Justice on the Supreme Court—and that it could harm the Court’s legitimacy. [read post]
