Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Taylor Longterm Care Center, Inc., et.al., No. 2008-CIV-3740 (Lacka. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
The 4th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:26 am
The IPKat hopes that Judge Birss’s optimism indeed becomes a reality and that the positive experience of those at Taylor Wessing can be replicated in other cases. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:53 am
In last month’s case (Taylor v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:22 pm
The Twelfth Court of Appeals in Tyler, Texas however has directly addressed the question of whether Section 18.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires an officer to personally appear and swear to the truth of the information in the affidavit in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:09 am
In today’s case (More Marine Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined” Schenectady from permitting the public to attend disciplinary hearings involving City of Schenectady police officers. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:48 am
Taylor are the reason why. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:20 am
Supp.2d 245, 258-59 & n.9 (E.D.N.Y. 1999); Taylor v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:50 am
Taylor v Taylor 2011 NY Slip Op 03049 Decided on April 12, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The supreme court denied husband’s motion for a downward modification of child support and maintenance and held husband in contempt for failure to pay arrears. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:11 am
While the recent case (R. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:55 am
Mandatory subjects of negotiationsCarmel PBA v PERB, 267 AD2d 858 The Carmel PBA case involves a “legal interpretation” made by the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:24 am
Von den Juristen sind jedenfalls Brehm v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
Cunningham, 104 A.D.2d 716; Rio v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm
I n the chief Pennsylvania case it cites, Taylor v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The Appellate Division rejected the Authority’s argument that “its action was a transfer permitted by Personnel Director rules without resort to a hearing” [Campbell v NYC Transit Authority, 253 AD2d 813], holding that Campbell was entitled to a Section 75 disciplinary hearing. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Is such “contracting out” of services a mandatory subject of collective bargaining within the meaning of the Taylor Law? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:27 am
Negotiating paid religious holidaysPort Washington UFSD v Port Washington TA, App. [read post]
