Search for: "U.S. v. North"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 6,788
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2016, 1:51 pm
Coast Guard received a request for a medevac from F/V BLUE NORTH, a Seattle-based fishing company, when a 41-year-old crew member sustained a neck injury while working on the vessel. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
I have therefore followed with interest media articles and social media discussions about the protest in North Dakota, U.S., regarding the major pipeline project being built there, as well as other protests and court cases related to issues of concern to Native Americans. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:53 am
On Tuesday, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
North Carolina. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
The following day, Ginsburg and Sotomayor made another joint appearance in New York, this time at the U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am
A U.S. airstrike may have killed 16 people in the town al-Heesha, 25 miles north of Raqqa, Reuters tells us. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:01 pm
Hog Slat, Inc., No. 7:14-CV-157-D, 2016 U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
(Teck), a smelter located ten miles north of the U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
(Teck), a smelter located ten miles north of the U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” Next up is Lightfoot v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:14 am
I, § 21 and U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
With the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” At The Huffington Post, Cristian Farias reports that, at a Clinton campaign event in North Carolina, President Barack Obama criticized North Carolina Sen. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:03 am
Five years ago, in Thompson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
” Commentary focusing on North Carolina Sen. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Pierce v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Today the court will hear oral argument in Venezuela v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:47 am
My colleague Jennifer Granick notes that existing case law supports this interpretation (she points to https://casetext.com/case/oce-north-america-inc-v-mcs-services as one example), and argues therefore that Item 5 advise prosecutors what the law is and how not to bring a case that will lose for an existing reason already enforced by the courts. [read post]
