Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 3221 - 3240 of 13,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2020, 7:57 pm by Amy Howe
The justices consolidated the three petitions (United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:33 am by Famighetti & Weinick
On March 6, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York, handed a gift to employees. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:22 am by randywallace
May 4 2015 Waiver of right of respondents Provident Advertising and Marketing, Inc., et al. to respond filed. [read post]
(No. 08-586, March 30, 2010), the United States Supreme Court has vacated the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Harris Assocs. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:45 pm by Bruno Tarabichi
  However, on February 23, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Fleischer Studios did not own the copyright to the Betty Boop character. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Windsor purchased a majority of the units at the Villages of Fondren from Fatima Investments, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
To state the case charitably, there are some decisions that deserved more than a single set of eyes, but the Policy provides no procedure for appeal. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Gene Quinn
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently instituted six separate inter partes reviews (IPRs) against patents owned by Allergan plc (NYSE: AGN), which cover RESTASIS® (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) 0.05%. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:29 am by Beth Graham
  In response, CEATS appealed the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am by Carolyn E. Wright
A different case on the other side of the United States. . . [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:25 am
In a non-precedential decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board of Patent Appeals and Interference's rejection of Mettke's claim 6 as being obvious in light of the cited references. [read post]