Search for: "All Property Services Inc." Results 3241 - 3260 of 5,788
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2013, 9:12 am by Administrator
Sable Offshore Energy Inc. et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
THE WINDMERE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., CITIZEN PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION; McCRORY BUILDING CO., INC., DELTA/UNITED SPECIALTIES, INC., ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., BRADLEY MASONRY, INC., ET AL., Appellees. 1st District.Attorneys -- Attorney's fees contract -- Trial court erred in denying petition for approval of a straight 40% contingency fee contract for representation of petitioner in a medical malpractice action -- Trial court… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm by Lorene Park
For example, a recruiter for a retained search firm who was fired two months after announcing her pregnancy and just a day after asking about maternity leave showed suspicious timing, but it only created triable issues on pretext when considered in conjunction with comments made by decisionmakers and evidence of her prior positive feedback (Dominick v Hospitality Valuation Services, Inc). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Duets Guest Blogger
and another for “Cotweet” filed by Launchability, Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:33 am
Large players in the senior housing arena include Health Care REIT, Inc., which has invested $4.3 billion in more than 120 Sunrise Senior Living properties, and Senior Housing Trust, based locally in Newton, which owns almost 400 properties. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:57 am by Amber Walsh
The 47 properties were wholly owned by Revera Inc., a portfolio company of Canadian-based investment firm Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP Investments) and the second-largest operator of senior housing and long-term care facilities in Canada. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:06 am by admin
”  Intellectual property and entertainment attorney Michael I. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 11:59 am by Wai Choy
Although Section 230 does not confer immunity with respect to all types of claims (for example, it explicitly excludes intellectual property law and certain criminal laws from its purview), it does immunize website operators against defamation claims arising out of third-party content. [read post]