Search for: "BAKER v. STATE" Results 3241 - 3260 of 3,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
”[8] This text states that a corporation’s cooperation with the government’s investigation is a mitigating factor by which a corporation can gain credit. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 10:12 am by Aaron Jue
EFF has adamantly defended encryption and its widespread use from the early days of Bernstein v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
Stewart Baker posted the next installment of the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring special guest . . . [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  Section 122, Housing Act 1996 enables an order to be made which makes different provision for different/ areas/classes of case/cases but there is no requirement for such differences, and no express requirement for HB to be set at a level that fully covers any claimant’s actual housing costs in any area.Grounds 2 and 3 were taken together as in sum they concern the (well-travelled) territory of “due regard” to the need to eliminate discrimination and promote equality on which… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
While last week's rejection of the Google Settlement by Judge Denny Chin received plenty of airing (see IPKat here, 1709 Blog here), the Chet Baker Class Action in Canada is worth taking a look it. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  Section 122, Housing Act 1996 enables an order to be made which makes different provision for different/ areas/classes of case/cases but there is no requirement for such differences, and no express requirement for HB to be set at a level that fully covers any claimant’s actual housing costs in any area.Grounds 2 and 3 were taken together as in sum they concern the (well-travelled) territory of “due regard” to the need to eliminate discrimination and promote equality on which… [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, the label applied by the employer is not determinative, as was affirmed in the recent case of Baker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court has held that Morrison v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:53 am by Rob Robinson
” TransPerfect was advised on the deal by CDX Advisors and law firms Baker Botts and Vinge. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane shared the government’s response-and-reply brief in Klayman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, the label applied by the employer is not determinative, as was affirmed in the recent case of Baker v. [read post]