Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 31,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
Brown, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that areview of the text message exchange between defendant and D.H. establishes a prima facie case for child endangerment.See State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 8:21 am
At the end of last month, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on two unrelated child pornography cases, U.S. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:59 am
View the article here10/30/2007US Supreme Court takes up the case of a man convicted of trying to distribute make-believe porn.Washington - Congress has long been concerned about the use of the Internet as an anonymous medium for the sale or exchange of child pornography.In response, law-enforcement officials have maintained an aggressive posture through undercover operations to shut down a thriving illicit market that victimizes children.But emerging technology is presenting new challenges… [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 am
In this case, the Court upholds the search of a man who was arrested for possessing child pornography, involving the "good faith" exception under the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
Background Three years ago in AA (Somalia) v ECO (Addis Ababa) [2013] UKSC 81, the Supreme Court considered whether a Somali child in her brother-in-law’s care under the doctrine of Kafalah – a process of legal guardianship and the Islamic equivalent to adoption – was an adopted child under the Immigration Rules, paragraph 352D relating to leave to enter or remain as the child of a refugee. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 12:44 pm
Morgan V. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:49 am
In X v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
In the case Uzoh v Uzoh (N.D. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:30 am
Exhibiting Harmful Material to a Child Sufficiency of the evidence; jury instructions [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:09 pm
The Gosserand court disagreed and held that since there was a “home state”, that was the strongest jurisdictional base and there was insufficient evidence to overcome it, and the “home state” was the appropriate jurisdiction.In Theresa Schoenecke, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
In Rubio v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:20 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 11:59 am
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:56 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 4:51 am
The post Lewis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:53 am
In Baumann-Chacon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 12:56 pm
L., Child Custody, Protection & Support § 35:2-2(b)(3) (2024); see also Lall v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:57 am
A jury convicted Appellant of first-degree child abuse, but was unable ... [read post]
