Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 3241 - 3260 of 112,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s remand order holding that if a defendant properly removed a putative class action, a district court’s subsequent denial of class certification does not divest the court of jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm by Minick Law
If the checkpoint involved in your case does not use signs to notify driver’s of a checkpoint ahead, then it would seem unreasonable to expect driver’s to know a checkpoint does lie ahead and therefore any motive to avoid the checkpoint dissipates. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
  The purpose of the release is crystal clear, to defend a malpractice action. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:39 pm by A. Brian Albritton
This case permits the defendant to use the government's knowledge of the alleged violation and its continued payment of claims to show that the so called violation must not be material if the government does nothing in the face of these allegations and continues to pay claims.Defendant's counsel Kathleen Fisher, Nathan F. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:39 pm by A. Brian Albritton
This case permits the defendant to use the government's knowledge of the alleged violation and its continued payment of claims to show that the so called violation must not be material if the government does nothing in the face of these allegations and continues to pay claims.Defendant's counsel Kathleen Fisher, Nathan F. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:55 am by Steven Eversole
The Supreme Court decided to pursue the third option, finding that federal law does not require each defendant to pay the full amount of restitution. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 5:17 am by Dominic Simon
Land Rover defends the DEFENDER trade mark.There are few vehicles as iconic and instantly recognisable as the classic Land Rover. [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:15 am by Broc Romanek
If a large hedge fund and a smaller defendant are engaged in similar conduct the SEC finds questionable, that smaller defendant is a softer target. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:06 pm
Curiously, the Court does not reference much of the language of the complaint itself, and it seems to rely on matters determined by further investigation to deny the duty to defend. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:39 am by Jon Katz
Being a former prosecutor does not answer whether the lawyer has the drive to do criminal defense work, nor does such experience preclude the lawyer from being great in criminal defense. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 8:10 pm by Michael Atkins
’ Because ‘[a]ny doubt as to the insurer’s liability must be resolved in favor of the insured,’ the court concluded that ‘the complaint’s failure to refer to ‘The Wearable Light’ as a slogan and its failure to include infringement of slogan as a specific claim does not alleviate [the] duty to defend. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:17 am
Judge Wood nevertheless permitted the counterclaim plaintiff to assert its work-for-hire defense in response to the counterclaim defendant’s copyright ownership claim, noting that the statute of limitations does not bar a defense. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:29 am by Jon Sands
  For a conspiracy conviction, it is not required that the defendant have knowledge of a federal nexus or requirement if the underlying substantive offense does not require knowledge of the federal identity. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 7:24 am by Docket Navigator
Plaintiff asserts that declining pendent venue over its claims against [defendant] would waste time and resources by bifurcating this matter into two separate suits on 'opposite sides of the country.' But, at this stage, Plaintiff’s argument is pure conjecture: Plaintiff does not claim, nor does it appear, that it has initiated this separate suit. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:40 am by Docket Navigator
[Defendant's] assumption that Fourco was no longer good law was reasonable but wrong, and it cannot be excused from its waiver by saying there was a change in the law. . . . ' Because the Supreme Court did not change the law, retroactivity is also not at issue, and the Court does not address Defendant's arguments regarding retroactivity. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:08 pm
MakeMyTrip brought suit in Western District because its registrar, defendant eNom, Inc., is located in Bellevue. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 6:10 pm
West Virginia is one of three states that does not afford litigants an automatic right to file an appeal. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 1:46 pm by John Jascob
Professor Macey argues that the SRP proposal does not contain a material omission, as it neither purports to contain a review of the academic literature nor suggests that contrary studies to not exist. [read post]