Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 8,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2018, 5:53 pm
In Walker v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Orion IP, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
However, last week The Guardian reported that Judge Davis had sanctioned the news company for withholding records from the claimants until the eve of the trial. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am
In Ring v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
We must therefore determine whether the statements were "testimonial," because only testimonial statements are subject to the Confrontation Clause (see Davis v Washington, 547 US 813, 821).In Brown (13 NY3d at 336), the report in question contained machine-generated raw data, graphs and charts of a male specimen's DNA characteristics that were isolated from a rape kit. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
So, as is often the case, the only remaining question was whether the school’s response was “clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances” such that it amounted to “deliberate indifference” under Davis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
So, as is often the case, the only remaining question was whether the school’s response was “clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances” such that it amounted to “deliberate indifference” under Davis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 5:38 pm
The good one is United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
Olivia de Havilland, DBE v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
App’x. 955, 962 (11th Cir.2008) (quoting Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:25 am
I have no doubt that, between her and McCain that Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:48 am
Here.... [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 1:04 pm
In some civil cases, there may exist a relevant police report. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:30 am
See Howard Bashman's links here, here, and here. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
Rather, the rule applies only where the benefit of deterrence outweighs the rule's "'substantial social costs.'" Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Crawford made some bold pronouncements but left a host of unanswered questions, some of which were later addressed in 2006 when the Court issued Davis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:35 pm
In Sylvester v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:36 am
Davis, 2009 U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 4:50 am
Davis, 2010 Ohio 4636, 2010 Ohio App. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
I suspect that after the Troy Davis circus they just don't want another high-profile capital case at this point.The other high-profile denial is Ryan v. [read post]
