Search for: "Day v. Texas" Results 3241 - 3260 of 7,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Adam Liptak reports in The New York Times on Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
If you do, come to EPLAW's Europe/Japan day of mock trials! [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
  The day after the court in Texas issued a nationwide injunction, Texas and three other states followed up with a second lawsuit filed in the same court – the Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Perry – that involved an Establishment Clause challenge to a six-foot-high, three-feet-wide Ten Commandments monument that sits at the corner between the Texas State Capitol and the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
This post examines a recentopinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas – Houston:  Bryant v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Long, The Constitutionality and Ethics of Execution-Day Prison Chaplaincy, [Abstract], 21 Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights 1-33 (2015).Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Unconscionable War on Moral Conscience (reviewing Robert P. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 5:07 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: This posting originally appeared on the Rocky Mountain Sign Law Blog here: The Texas Highway Beautification Act permits “political” signs to be displayed no more than 90 days before an election and 10 days after an election. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Yazzie, supra.The opinion then explains that Martinez also testified thatwhen the MVD learns a vehicle is uninsured, it notifies the owner and allows a total of ninety-five days for the owner to produce evidence of financial responsibility before suspending the registration of that vehicle. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:37 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts Texas Appeals Court Holds that Separate Governmental Tort Liability Limits Applied to Multiple Defendants – Rodriguez v. [read post]