Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 3241 - 3260 of 25,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2015, 6:47 am by Wells Bennett
A programming note from Lawfare HQ: for the rest of this week, Lawfare unfortunately won't be almost-live-blogging pre-trial motions litigation in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
§ 78u-6(h)(1)(a), apply to an employee who is terminated by a non-U.S. corporation that does business in (and is regulated by) the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cir. 2009)International Trade:· United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:24 am by Sumter Camp
There being nothing of particular interest issued in the last couple of days [okay, so I'm about a week late with this] we are going to reach back to a case from January, United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 1:59 am
Louis Post Dispatch reports on yesterday's oral arguments in the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. [read post]
” When Trafigura challenged the denial, the government argued that the levy was not a prohibited tax on exports but a “user fee,” citing United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
On September 28, 2019, just days before they were to appear before the Rabbinical Court, Respondent booked a round-trip ticket for her and the children from Tel Aviv to the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
On September 28, 2019, just days before they were to appear before the Rabbinical Court, Respondent booked a round-trip ticket for her and the children from Tel Aviv to the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 3:29 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Court then turned to the question of whether plaintiffs had adequately stated causes of action under Counts IV and V. [read post]