Search for: "Day v. United States Of America"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 3,398
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
I have been referred, helpfully, to a number of Canadian and United States of America cases touching on the matters under review: cases such as Loper v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:05 am
Ferguson (1896) that the Constitution permitted state-mandated segregation as long as facilities were "'equal but separate.'" That decision held sway until Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 3:01 am
On this day in ...... 1980, the International Court of Justice rendered its decision in United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:44 am
The Supreme Court upheld the state's right to condemn and take the land upon payment of just compensation in Kelo v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
On some days, it's hard to get back into the routine.We'd rather keep mining the depths of Colacicco to see what nuggets we can unearth there.But we owe it to you to provide a short post about the California Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism ActUSCIS.................................. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
The United States, of course, should live up to its treaty commitments. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 7:28 am
" Here is how this strong piece starts and ends:Nearly 135 years ago, the United States experienced what may have been the worst one-day slaughter of blacks by whites in its history. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
It was also a victory for the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
Even in the early days, there were disputes about what this phrase meant. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 pm
Now this case is similar to a case from the United Kingdom which is Evans v. [read post]
