Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 3241 - 3260 of 29,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2021, 9:48 am by Sarah Aberg and Matthew Lin
 In defending the Board Diversity Rule, Nasdaq relied on empirical evidence and peer reviewed studies that established a link between diverse boards and enhanced company performance, innovation, long-term sustainable returns, and investor protection. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Absence of transcript -- Trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of insurer in case involving proper application of policy deductible -- Although there is no transcript of pre-trial conference where rulingwas made, error is apparent on face of record where explanation of review documents submitted by insurer show that insurer applied the fee schedule authorized by 627.736(5)(a)1.f. to total charges before applying PIP deductible. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sabhani, 493 F.3d 63, 75 (2d Cir. 2007); see also United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 5:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
" And Message Eighteen again includes a reference to "Führer Crow," this time accompanied by a stream of vulgarities. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A duty to disclose may arise in four circumstances: “(1) when the defendant is in a fiduciary relationship with the plaintiff; (2) when the defendant had exclusive knowledge of material facts not known to the plaintiff; (3) when the defendant actively conceals a material fact from the plaintiff; and (4) when the defendant makes partial representations but also suppresses some material facts. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., 987 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2021), which considered all these claims except for false advertising. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:47 am
Loney, 219 F.3d 281 (3d Cir. 2000), the Third Circuit held that the “in connection with” requirement would exclude situations in which “the presence of the gun was merely ‘accidental,’ had no ‘purpose or effect with respect to’ [the defendant’s] drug offense, or did not ‘facilitate or have the potential of facilitating’ [the defendant’s] drug dealing. [read post]