Search for: "Doe LLC" Results 3241 - 3260 of 28,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 3:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kram Knarf, LLC v Djonovic, 74 AD3d 628, 628 [1st Dept 2010]; Fielding v Kupferman, 65 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:53 pm by N. Scott Pierce
Despite potentially relevant Supreme Court precedent in Thomas and Granfinanciera, the better view under the weight of Supreme Court precedent with respect to patent validity, absent the recent decision by the Court in Oil States, is that determination of the validity of issued patents does not include the government as a party and, therefore, only private rights are involved. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:42 am by Venkat
[Post by Venkat, with comments from Eric] Ardis Health, LLC, Curb Your Cravings, LLC and USA Herbals, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Stephen F. McDonough
The Divorce Collaborative LLC is a Massachusetts law firm with offices in Franklin and Bedford, MA. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:55 pm by Kristina Araya
  One of the developers, the intervening defendant, sold a condominium unit in its development to McDonald’s USA, LLC. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Said the court: “If that language does not make the rest of the section mandatory in the dissolution section, and we are persuaded that it does not, it cannot be said that the ‘shall’ in the introduction of the dissociation section does the opposite. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Said the court: “If that language does not make the rest of the section mandatory in the dissolution section, and we are persuaded that it does not, it cannot be said that the ‘shall’ in the introduction of the dissociation section does the opposite. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Said the court: “If that language does not make the rest of the section mandatory in the dissolution section, and we are persuaded that it does not, it cannot be said that the ‘shall’ in the introduction of the dissociation section does the opposite. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:31 pm by Silver Law Group
His previous employers included Maxim Group LLC (CRD# 120708) and Stockkings Capital LLC (CRD# 164445) of New York, NY, and Caldwell International Securities (CRD#:104323) of Nassau. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:30 pm
The LLC provides a robocalling service for third party clients. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
  Not only does it do so, but equally happily, in my view, it publishes (albeit belatedly) the opinion. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Michael Smith
In our opinion, the best choice of entity for most small businesses is a limited liability company, not a corporation, and the new benefit corporation statute does not change that opinion. [read post]