Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 3241 - 3260
of 5,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 6:26 am
But that does not mean that they are subject to substantial pressure to do so, let alone substantial pressure imposed by federal law--it might, on the whole, be a modest or tentative or ambivalent preference. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:16 am
Hobby Lobby Part III -- There is no "employer mandate"Hobby Lobby Part III-A -- Does federal law substantially pressure employers to offer health insurance coverage in violation of religious obligations, even though there is no “employer mandate”? [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:31 pm
In general they are rules that guide theprotection of human rights, or the requirement, for example, for due process visà-vis the wanted person, guaranteeing his physical safety, which may berequested because our laws so permit. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:57 pm
According to the FIRPTA tax regime, a buyer of real estate from a foreign national is required to report the purchase/sale to the IRS vis a vis IRS Forms 8288 and 8288-A, and pay the applicable 10% tax withholding amount by no later than the twentieth day after the sale. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:11 pm
According to NIST, it complements, but does not replace, an organization's existing risk management processes and cybersecurity program. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:07 pm
According to NIST, it complements, but does not replace, an organization's existing risk management processes and cybersecurity program. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:40 am
(vi) Thus even if it were possible to duplicate the role of the trial judge, it cannot in practice be done." [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
First, federal law does not require the Greens to do anything in particular--not to purchase contraception, nor to reimburse employees, nor to file any plan documents involving contraception, etc. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:30 pm
Just ask AOL and CompuServe and see where their profits rank vis a vis Google for instance. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:34 pm
Hobby Lobby Part III -- There is no "employer mandate"Hobby Lobby Part III-A -- Does federal law substantially pressure employers to offer health insurance coverage in violation of religious obligations, even though there is no “Employer Mandate”? [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Not only does she assert that defense, she also counterclaims against Pierce, raising the same claim tortious interference with the expectation of a gift that she had raised in the Texas probate proceeding. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
But otherwise, the government does not expend a great deal of energy defending special rules for corporations, as such. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:12 pm
The Ordinance of British Honduras is strikingly similar to Section 46, subdivision 1, subsection (vi) of the English Administration of Estates Act, 1925. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Sprint contends that the Phones often are sold overseas, where it does not provide service. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Does that mean there’s never litigation among members of Delaware LLCs that have sophisticated LLC agreements? [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
[vi] N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
Does Ghosh disagree with Lobel's argument that "talent wants to be free," or does he simply see deferring to state "laboratories of experimentation" as preferable to top down interference from a federal institution? [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
But that does not dispose of the constitutional question whether misrepresentation of religious experience or belief is prosecutable; it rather emphasizes the danger of such prosecutions…. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:14 am
He or she was highlighting a crucially-important limitation on NSA’s authority vis a vis US persons. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
§ 101(31): The term “insider” includes — (A) if the debtor is an individual— (i) relative of the debtor or of a general partner of the debtor; (ii) partnership in which the debtor is a general partner; (iii) general partner of the debtor; or (iv) corporation of which the debtor is a director, officer, or person in control; (B) if the debtor is a corporation— (i) director of the debtor; (ii) officer of the debtor; (iii) person in control of the debtor; (iv)… [read post]
