Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,702
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
And Robb may think it going out on a limb, but I for one have complete confidence that the State of Arizona will be able to figure out what its own constitution does and does not allow. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
Homestead exemption — Definitions — Excepted obligations — Water rights and interests — Conveyance — Sale and disposition — Property right for federal tax purposes. (1) For purposes of this section: (a) “Household” means a group of persons related by blood or marriage living together in the same dwelling as an economic unit, sharing furnishings, facilities, accommodations, and expenses. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:53 am
Remember, it is civil in nature and does not have an affect on your criminal case. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 4:32 am
Blackletter L.J. 41 (2009). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board went on: “However, this does not mean that i f R 64 (a) is not or not correctly met then A 107 first sentence will necessarily not be complied with” (idem). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:29 am
Then, a “commercial item” is defined, by cross reference to 41 USC 103 as “an item, that— (1)(A) is of a type customarily used by the general public or by nongovernmental entities for purposes other than governmental purposes. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm
Last year a similar case arose concerning a 41 year old man with a low IQ. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm
Part 1 is here. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Rev. 1-55(2011).Highland, Howard L. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Her parents pursued a negligence action, but the domestic law does not provide a remedy for parents of grown-up children. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:14 am
§ 101(41). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:12 am
On the night of the accident, the Faccone's 1986 Cadillac was stopped in the left lane of Highway 41 in Collier County where it had stalled. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:40 am
Inc., 41 AD3d 259 [2007]; Kyle v City of New York, 268 AD2d 192 [2000], lv denied 97 NY2d 608 [2002]). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
Although that led to a bit of repetition in the 86-page opinion, the court's decision can be boiled down to the following basic points. 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:36 am
New evidence, even enough to sow a field of doubt, does not necessarily entitle a defendant, not even one on death row, to a new trial. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:26 am
But he does seem to recognize the problem of global warming. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:15 pm
One of the amendments that passed by a 58-41 vote would extend the new rules of the bill to cover members of the executive branch. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm
The practice of texting, emailing or surfing the web is so ubiquitous that 1 in 100 car drivers are doing at any one time. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Does the [opponent’s] new argument amount to a new or amended case within the meaning of the RPBA? [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs 1 and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision. [read post]